The Jungle Book (Animated 1967) vs The Jungle Book (Live action animated 2016)
The Jungle Book (Animated 1967)
- Produced by Walt Disney.
- Inspired by Rudyard Kipling's book.
- 19th Disney animated feature film.
- Directed by Wolfgang Reitherman.
Plot : The plot of this movie follows Mowgli, a feral child raised in the Indian jungle by wolves, as his friends Bagheera the panther and Baloo the bear try to convince him to leave the jungle before the evil tiger Shere Khan arrives.
Trailer : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNVTKXIK7q8&t=92s
The Jungle Book (Live action animated 2016)
Trailer : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNVTKXIK7q8&t=92s
The Jungle Book (Live action animated 2016)
- Produced by Walt Disney
- Directed and co-produced by Jon Favreau.
- Written by Justin Marks.
- Live action/CGI film.
Plot : It tells the story of Mowgli, an orphaned human boy who, guided by his animal guardians, sets out on a journey of self-discovery while evading the threatening Shere Khan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VK2yuSQbIjI
Basically, these movies both are very entertaining and well presented in their own ways. Obviously, both consists of the same story plot but the major differences among the two include the version. One is animated and the other is live action animated. There is a huge difference between these two entities. Animated movies are ones in which individual drawings, paintings, or illustrations that are photographed frame by frame. Whereas live action animated movies is a genre that combines both live action with traditional animation or computer animation sequences that add to the plot or sequence of films which can include portraying animated characters interacting with cast members.
Animation has an endless stream of possibilities that cannot be restricted by any such laws of our simple physical dimension. Animation can stretch across the fabrics of space and time, and even many popular "live action" movies are made with special effect animating. Animating represents infinity, which is a pretty neat concept in itself. Animation also takes much more work and effort as live action shots only require the movement of a body part or a stunt double to do something crazy, while there are an incredible amount of artists focused on drawing each individual frame, as well as matching audio with visual elements to blend together a spectacular show of emotion and reality. Some animations have given the style a bad name, or bad taste temporarily, but in my opinion, animation is just that much cooler.
Basically, these movies both are very entertaining and well presented in their own ways. Obviously, both consists of the same story plot but the major differences among the two include the version. One is animated and the other is live action animated. There is a huge difference between these two entities. Animated movies are ones in which individual drawings, paintings, or illustrations that are photographed frame by frame. Whereas live action animated movies is a genre that combines both live action with traditional animation or computer animation sequences that add to the plot or sequence of films which can include portraying animated characters interacting with cast members.
Animation has an endless stream of possibilities that cannot be restricted by any such laws of our simple physical dimension. Animation can stretch across the fabrics of space and time, and even many popular "live action" movies are made with special effect animating. Animating represents infinity, which is a pretty neat concept in itself. Animation also takes much more work and effort as live action shots only require the movement of a body part or a stunt double to do something crazy, while there are an incredible amount of artists focused on drawing each individual frame, as well as matching audio with visual elements to blend together a spectacular show of emotion and reality. Some animations have given the style a bad name, or bad taste temporarily, but in my opinion, animation is just that much cooler.
No comments:
Post a Comment